Development of "Magic Hat Action Cards" as a Game-Based and Multimodal Learning Medium for Poetry Reading

Authors

Keywords:

Game-based learning, Multimodality, Poetry reading, Learning media, Formative evaluation

Abstract

Learning to read poetry requires not only an understanding of the text's content but also the ability to communicate meaning through pronunciation, intonation, expression, tempo, and emotional engagement. A needs analysis conducted in a Grade X class at SMAN 1 Purwosari revealed that while students possessed a basic understanding of poetry, they struggled to translate that understanding into an expressive oral performance. This study aimed to develop and conduct a preliminary evaluation of the "Magic Hat Action Cards," a game-based learning medium that integrates a drawing mechanism, activity cards, and audiovisual examples accessible via QR codes. This study employed the ADDIE model, which comprises analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation phases. Data were collected through expert assessments, student and teacher response questionnaires, observations, interviews, and a poetry reading performance rubric. The implementation involved 33 Grade X students. The results indicated validation scores of 97.92% from subject matter experts and 80% from media experts, along with positive responses from students (85.96%) and teachers (97.92%). The average poetry-reading performance score was 82.20. These findings demonstrate that the "Magic Hat Action Cards" is a viable and well-received learning medium for poetry reading. However, as the study involved only a single class without a pretest-posttest design or a control group, the performance results cannot be interpreted as definitive evidence of improvement or a causal effect attributable to the medium used. The study’s contribution lies in the integration of game mechanics, multimodal scaffolding, and performative practice in poetry reading instruction

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Fitri Nurul'Ain binti Nordin, Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam

    AKADEMI PENGAJIAN BAHASA

References

Abdul Jabbar, A. I., & Felicia, P. (2015). Gameplay engagement and learning in game-based learning: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 740–779. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315577210

Acquah, E. O., & Katz, H. T. (2020). Digital game-based L2 learning outcomes for primary through high-school students: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 143, 103667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103667

Ahn, C., & Minuk, A. (2025). Poetry unveiled: Multimodality and aesthetic responses as a fresh approach to teaching and reading verse. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 68(5), 506–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1381

Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M. B., Bellotti, F., de Freitas, S., Louchart, S., Suttie, N., Berta, R., & De Gloria, A. (2015). Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12113

Boyle, E. A., Hainey, T., Connolly, T. M., Gray, G., Earp, J., Ott, M., Lim, T., Ninaus, M., Ribeiro, C., & Pereira, J. (2016). An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 94, 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582065

Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004

Curwood, J. S., & Cowell, L. L. H. (2011). iPoetry: Creating space for new literacies in the English curriculum. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00014

Dai, W.-A., Xu, W., & Xing, Q.-W. (2025). Gamified learning impact: A meta-analysis of game element combinations on students’ learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(4), 2617–2643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10493-y

Fyfield, M., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2022). Improving instructional video design: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7296

Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607

Hafner, C. A. (2015). Remix culture and English language teaching: The expression of learner voice in digital multimodal compositions. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 486–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.238

Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377

Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07310586

Jusslin, S., & Höglund, H. (2021). Arts-based responses to teaching poetry: A literature review of dance and visual arts in poetry education. Literacy, 55(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12236

Kim, N. J., Belland, B. R., & Walker, A. E. (2018). Effectiveness of computer-based scaffolding in the context of problem-based learning for STEM education: Bayesian meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 397–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9419-1

Krath, J., Schürmann, L., & von Korflesch, H. F. O. (2021). Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 106963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106963

Landers, R. N. (2014). Developing a theory of gamified learning: Linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 752–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114563660

Lim, F. V., Toh, W., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2022). Multimodality in the English language classroom: A systematic review of literature. Linguistics and Education, 69, 101048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101048

Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

Newfield, D., & D’Abdon, R. (2015). Reconceptualising poetry as a multimodal genre. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.239

Nkomo, L. M., Daniel, B. K., & Butson, R. (2021). Synthesis of student engagement with digital technologies: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00270-1

Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533

Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.023

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Routledge.

Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w

Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8

Sousa, C., Rye, S., Sousa, M., Torres, P. J., Perim, C., Mansuklal, S. A., & Ennami, F. (2023). Playing at the school table: Systematic literature review of board, tabletop, and other analog game-based learning approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1160591. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1160591

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Yang, L., Li, R., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Research trends of game-based language learning in K–12 education: A systematic review of SSCI articles during 2009–2022. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12944

Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326

Downloads

Published

2026-09-26

How to Cite

Development of "Magic Hat Action Cards" as a Game-Based and Multimodal Learning Medium for Poetry Reading. (2026). JTLI : Journal of Technology, Language and Innovation, 1(1), 30-43. https://hmacademicprees.com/jtli/article/view/3